1. An autonomous system that runs your operations 24/7.
2. An email agent you send tasks and files to.
It's everything around them.
You are already paying for this.
In staff. In outsourcing. In missed revenue.
Qualified new lead from website intake
2m ago
Sent follow-up #3 to Martinez (auto)
14m ago
Updated matter status: Williams v. Acme
1h ago
Intake, follow-ups, billing, matter tracking, document workflows. All running in the background, 24/7. You get full visibility through a dashboard.
No one needs to manage it.
It just runs.
Send a task to ask@givance.ai with your files attached. Compare exhibits, summarize threads, organize documents. Get finished work back in your inbox.
“Summarize this 700-email thread”
“Compare 1,200 exhibits and show differences”
“Follow up with this lead”
“Organize these files for review”
This is not assistance.
This is execution.
2 messages
Compare the attached exhibit lists and identify overlaps before our call tomorrow.
Done. Here's what I found:
Full comparison attached.
You are already spending on operations.
We replace it.
Lead follow-up rate
Intake conversion
Avg. response time
Billing recovery
Ops overhead grows faster than revenue — hiring can't keep up
Operations scale automatically — zero additional headcount
20–40
Typical ceiling
100+
With Givance
0
Extra ops hires
Most firms stall at 20–40 lawyers.
Not because of demand.
Because operations break.
We remove that constraint.
You're going to spend on operations anyway.
Instead of paying for fragmented tools and staff,
invest in the system replacing them.
This is not additional spend.
It's reallocating existing spend into something with leverage.
Current operational spend
Reallocated with Givance
60%
Cost reduction
24/7
Coverage
Equity
Upside
The work around lawyers is being automated.
The question is not if.
It's whether your firm runs on it
or competes against firms that do.